How we choose and compare coffee makers

Our comparisons are research-based. We have not tested these machines in a lab or at home, and we never present research as hands-on testing.

1. Build the shortlist

For each category we read Amazon's best-seller list (top 30) on the day we update, plus the latest hands-on guides from Wirecutter, Serious Eats, Good Housekeeping, The Spruce Eats and WIRED. A model makes the table if an expert source picked it, or if it is a top seller we think readers will ask about. Best-sellers that no expert source picked get a "Popular pick" badge and a plain caveat.

2. Collect specs

Capacities, features and materials come from maker pages, retailer listings and the expert reviews. If a maker doesn't state a feature, the table says "n/a" instead of guessing.

3. Summarize reviewers fairly

We paraphrase what each publication found and link to it with its update date. We don't copy reviews or customer comments, and we don't show Amazon star ratings, review counts or prices.

4. Assign badges with simple rules

  • Best overall: the model with the most expert picks in the category; ties go to the one whose reviews describe the best results for the most people.
  • Best value: the lowest price tier among models with at least one expert pick.
  • Best for…: the model that expert reviewers single out for a specific need, such as auto-brew or travel.
  • Popular pick: a best-seller with no expert pick in our sources.

5. Our only "score"

The Expert picks column is a simple count of the independent publications that recommend a model. We don't publish star scores, and we never borrow any publication's rating scale.

Money

Amazon links carry our Associates tag, and we may earn from qualifying purchases. That never changes which products appear or which badge they get. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. See our disclosure.